Good
day!!!!! And still on the traffictjam of Jakarta.............................
huh
Its
long time for me to write a movie summary or review in my blog. Yappp, it’s so
many workssssssssss in my head! PPL, Project, and other activitiess
Okay,
back to the main topic. Actually this movie which I’ve watched is older than the
box office movies in this year and before. Maybe this movie has been launched
on 5 years ago (in 2008). When I still on the High School.
Taraaaaaa....
That’s
“The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.”
In
my opinion, in first impression when I saw the cover of the DVD, I didn’t
interested. It just; a man who sitting in the old chair who lives in 50’s era. A
little bit of “ancient”.
Why
the title submitted “Currious Case” inside of?
Anyway,
lets begin the story, that question would be answered soon, hihihi
"The
Curious Case of Benjamin Button" is a splendidly made film based on a
profoundly mistaken premise. It tells the story of a man who is old when he is
born and an infant when he dies. All those around him, everyone he knows and
loves, grow older in the usual way, and he passes them on the way down. As I
watched the film, I became consumed by a conviction that this was simply wrong.
Let me
paraphrase the oldest story I know: In the beginning, there was nothing, and then
God said, "Let there be light." Everything comes after the
beginning, and we all seem to share this awareness of the direction of time's
arrow. There is a famous line by e.e. cummings that might seem to apply to
Benjamin Button: and down he forgot as up he grew. But no, it involves
the process of forgetting our youth as we grow older.
We begin a
movie or novel and assume it will tell a story in chronological time.
Flashbacks and flash-forwards, we understand. If it moves backward through a
story (Harold Pinter's "Betrayal"), its
scenes reflect a chronology seen out of order. If a day repeats itself (Harold
Ramis' "Groundhog Day"),
each new day begins with the hero awakening and moving forward. If time is
fractured into branching paths ("Synecdoche,
New York"), it is about how we attempt to control our lives.
Even time-travel stories always depend on the inexorable direction of time.
Yes, you say,
but Benjamin Button's story is a fantasy. I realize that. It can invent as much
as it pleases. But the film's admirers speak of how deeply they were touched,
what meditations it invoked. I felt instead: Life doesn't work this way.
We are an observer of our passage, and so are others. It has been proposed that
one reason people marry is because they desire a witness to their lives. How
could we perform that act of love if we were aging in opposite directions?
The
movie's premise devalues any relationship, makes futile any friendship or
romance, and spits, not into the face of destiny, but backward into the maw of
time. It even undermines the charm of compound interest. In the film, Benjamin
(Brad Pitt)
as an older man is enchanted by a younger girl (Cate
Blanchett). Later in the film, when he is younger and she is older,
they make love. This is presumably meant to be the emotional high point. I
shuddered. No! No! What are they thinking during sex? What
fantasies apply? Does he remember her as a girl? Does she picture the old man
she loved?
Pitt
will of course be nominated for best actor and may deserve it because of his
heroic struggle in the performance. Yes, he had to undergo much makeup, create
body language and perform physically to be manipulated by computers. He
portrays the Ages of Man with much skill. That goes with the territory. But how
did he prepare emotionally? What exercises would the Method suggest? You
can't go through life waving goodbye. He is born looking like a baby with all
the infirmities old age. He grows younger, until he resembles Brad Pitt, and
then a younger Brad Pitt, and then -- we do not follow him all the way as he
recedes into the temporal distance.
The
Curious Case of Benjamin Button" is third among the top five favorites for
best picture. It may very well win. It expends Oscar-worthy talents on an
off-putting gimmick. I can't imagine many people wanting to see the movie twice.
There was another film in 2008 that
isn't in the "top five," or listed among the front-runners at all,
and it's a profound consideration of the process of living and aging. That's
Charlie Kaufman's "Synecdoche, New York." It will be viewed and
valued decades from now. You mark my words. Ahayyyy. :--------------P
Ps: the poster of the film cannot be attached, I don't know why
